Skip to content

  • Home
  • COVID-19 Guide
  • Podcast library
  • Client results
  • Expertise
  • News & Insights
  • People
  • Our DNA
  • Inclusion and Diversity
  • Join us
  • Contact Us
Home / NEWS & INSIGHTS / Insight / Arbitration agreements – is your dispute resolution clause enforceable?
Insight 20 January 2022

Arbitration agreements – is your dispute resolution clause enforceable?

Commercial contracts often provide mechanisms for parties to resolve disputes outside the orthodox court process. Parties will often include these alternative dispute resolution clauses for a range of reasons, but the underlying reasons usually include confidentiality concerns, cost or the need for expedient resolution of disputes. 

One such mechanism for dispute resolution is for the parties to submit to arbitration through what is referred to as an ‘arbitrations clause’, which intends to solely refer the parties to arbitration for disputed matters. The drafting of such clauses is critical to determining whether the intended referral to arbitration will be enforceable.

In the recent case of Lin & Anor v Lee [2021] QSC 336 (Lin), Martin J clarified the use of dispute resolution clauses in commercial agreements to be classified as an ‘arbitration agreement’ in accordance with section 7 of the Commercial Arbitration Act 2013 (Qld) (the Act).

The Case

In Lin, the plaintiffs and defendant entered into a contract for the defendant to provide migratory services (the contract). The plaintiffs subsequently commenced proceedings against the defendant some years later for alleged negligence and breach of contract. The defendant applied for orders to stay the proceeding and refer the matter to arbitration in accordance with section 8 of the Act. The application was made on the basis that the dispute resolution clause in the contract constituted an arbitration agreement within the meaning of the Act.

Relevantly, section 7 of the Act defines an ‘arbitration agreement’, alongside other features, as follows:

‘An arbitration agreement is an agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes which have arisen or which may arise between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not.’

The relevant clause 11 in the contract, provided for the resolution of the dispute by a number of steps, including by clause 11(c) that (our emphasis):

‘If the parties cannot reach an agreement within 21 days, the parties agree to refer the dispute to the Australian Commercial Dispute Centre (ACDC) for final settlement by a single arbitrator appointed in accordance with the Rules of the ACDC, or by another dispute resolution process suggested by ACDC and accepted by the parties. It is expected that any fees payable to ACDC or to the person appointed by ACDC will be paid by the parties equally.’[1]

In assessing the clause, Martin J considered that the dispute resolution clause should be interpreted ‘by reference to the contractual text construed in  light of its context and purpose’, in accordance with uncontroversial principles of commercial contractual construction.[2]  Accordingly, his Honour noted that the clause did not represent an agreement between the parties that disputes were to be submitted to arbitration, rather it specified that disputes were to be referred for ‘final settlement by a single arbitrator’.[3]

In detailing his considerations, his Honour adopted the position set out in New South Wales Court of Appeal’s decision in Jemena Gas Networks (NSW) Ltd v AGL Energy Limited [2017] NSWCA 266 (Jemena).  In Jemena, the court decided a clause would not be an arbitration agreement if it ‘merely identifies the possibility of arbitration without any express or implicit agreement to submit all disputes or any class of disputes to arbitration, as opposed to litigating’.[4]  That is, any arbitration clause must be drafted with enough specificity to leave no doubt that the parties are to submit to an arbitration.

Key Factors

Relevantly, Martin J considered a number of key factors as to why this clause could not be defined as an ‘arbitration agreement’ per the Act, including:[5]

1              the clause did not require the parties submit to an arbitration, rather it required referral of the dispute for ‘final settlement by a single arbitrator’;  

2              neither the clause nor the ACDC rules necessarily require a single arbitrator to engage in arbitration;

3              the clause contemplated other dispute settlement methods being agreed upon by the parties, rather than solely reliance on arbitration; and

4              the clause otherwise contemplated that the parties would be unable to resolve their differences through the ACDC, which is inconsistent with the ACDC rules. 

Ultimately, Martin J dismissed the application for orders referring the matter to arbitration and staying the proceedings. This is because while the clause contemplated the possibility of arbitration, there was no express agreement to submit a dispute to arbitration.[6]

Commentary

When drafting commercial contracts, parties who wish to have any dispute heard by arbitration need to take particular care. That is, in order for parties to protect themselves – whether that is due to privacy concerns with litigation, expediency, or any other issues – careful consideration is required to ensure that the arbitration clause is enforceable in accordance with the Act.

If you are in the process of preparing or negotiating a contract, we can assist you to draft an arbitration agreement or provide advice if you are considering alternative dispute resolution, tailored to your specific requirements. 

For further information contact our team.


[1] Lin v Lee [2021] QSC 336, [8].

[2] Lin v Lee [2021] QSC 336, [15].

[3] Lin v Lee [2021] QSC 336, [17].

[4] Lin v Lee [2021] QSC 336, [22] referring to Jemena Gas Networks (NSW) Ltd v AGL Energy Limited [2017] NSWCA 266, [27].

[5] Lin v Lee [2021] QSC 336, [20].

[6] Lin v Lee [2021] QSC 336, [23] – [24].

This publication covers legal and technical issues in a general way. It is not designed to express opinions on specific cases. It is intended for information purposes only and should not be regarded as legal advice. Further advice should be obtained before taking action on any issue dealt with in this publication.

About the authors

  • Tim Case

    Partner
  • Tim Bowles

    Lawyer
  • Jemimah Rowlandson

    Research Clerk

In other news

Branding on trend: Certification of Australian Fashion

10 May 2022Insight

Verification of identity: a refresher

10 May 2022Insight

Categorising land for rating purposes used for both permanent residential and temporary tourist accommodation

4 May 2022Insight

Court of Appeal decision brings welcome relief to local councils

4 May 2022Insight

VIEW ALL NEWS & INSIGHTS

BRISBANE

Level 11, 66 Eagle Street
Brisbane QLD 4000
GPO Box 1855
Brisbane QLD 4001
Tel +61 7 3233 8888
Fax +61 7 3229 9949

 

GET IN TOUCH

    Contact form

    We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

    Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

    sydney

    Level 32, MLC Centre
    19 Martin Place
    Sydney NSW 2000
    GPO Box 462
    Sydney NSW 2001

    Tel +61 2 8241 5600
    Fax +61 2 8241 5699

     

    GET IN TOUCH

      Contact form


      We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

      Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

      melbourne

      Level 27, 101 Collins Street
      Melbourne VIC 3000
      GPO Box 2924
      Melbourne VIC 3001

      Tel +61 3 9067 3100
      Fax +61 3 9067 3199

       

      GET IN TOUCH

        Contact form

        We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

        Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

        follow us

        CLIENT LOGIN

        newcastle

        92 Young Street
        Carrington NSW 2294
        PO Box 394
        Newcastle NSW 2300

        Tel +61 2 4914 6900
        Fax +61 2 4914 6999

         

        GET IN TOUCH

          Contact form


          We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

          Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

          canberra

          Level 9, 2 Phillip Law Street
          Canberra ACT 2601

          Tel +61 2 6243 3669
          Fax +61 2 8241 5699

           

          GET IN TOUCH

            Contact form


            We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

            Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

            © 2017 McCullough Robertson. Site map Disclaimer Privacy Policy Statement of Business Ethics Credit Reporting Policy

            X