Skip to content

  • Home
  • COVID-19 Guide
  • Podcast library
  • Client results
  • Expertise
  • News & Insights
  • People
  • Our DNA
  • Inclusion and Diversity
  • Join us
  • Contact Us
Home / NEWS & INSIGHTS / Insight / Elections to be rerun for three local councils following technical glitch
Insight 4 May 2022

Elections to be rerun for three local councils following technical glitch

In 2022, it is clear that many, if not most activities that we would ordinarily carry out in person, can now be done online. But sometimes, technology fails and things can go wrong. The 2021 NSW local government elections are an example of that.

The NSW Supreme Court recently set aside the 2021 local government election results in respect of the Shellharbour City, Kempsey Shire, and Singleton Councils because of a technical issue with their remote electronic voting system, iVote. Those Councils must now rerun their elections. The technical issue in question in the case of NSW Electoral Commission v Kempsey Shire Council (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 282 was that, because of high iVote uptake, not all voters who applied to use iVote actually received the iVote number that they needed to be able to actually vote remotely.

Applicable law and issue

Section 310 of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) (LG Act) requires contested elections to be conducted in accordance with a set of regulations, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021 (NSW) (Regulations). The Regulations (see clause 333E) require the Electoral Commissioner to allow any eligible voter who applies for technology assisted voting to vote through it. From the outset it was agreed by the parties that a breach of those provisions had occurred, but the Court had to decide whether those breaches went beyond merely formal defects (which are allowed under section 317 of the Act) and therefore justified the setting aside of the election results. A further issue was whether the results should be set aside in their entirety, or only for those Councillors whose positions were affected.

The Court’s decision

The Court assessed whether the iVote failure justified setting aside the results in terms of materiality, comparing the number of voters that were prevented from voting with the winning margin of the elected candidate. For example, in Shellharbour City Council, there were 54 people who had been prevented from voting and a margin of only four votes between the last two candidates. In each of the elections in Shellharbour City, Kempsey Shire, and Singleton, the Court concluded that the breach was material.

In deciding whether to partly or wholly set aside the results, the Court distinguished between the proportional system of voting adopted for local government elections, and the preferential voting system adopted at other levels of government. The Court held that it could not partly set aside the election without the rerun election becoming in effect preferential voting, which would frustrate the purpose behind the proportional voting scheme operated by the NSW Government. On that basis the Court set aside the entire election.

The Act requires that once a declaration has been made that the elections are invalid, they must be rerun within three months. Although those declarations have been deferred, residents of the Shellharbour City, Kempsey Shire and Singleton Councils, should expect rerun elections in the near future. As a result of this case, the NSW Government has announced that it will no longer use the iVote system until such time that these technical glitches can be fully investigated and addressed.

This publication covers legal and technical issues in a general way. It is not designed to express opinions on specific cases. It is intended for information purposes only and should not be regarded as legal advice. Further advice should be obtained before taking action on any issue dealt with in this publication.

About the authors

  • Kate Swain

    Partner
  • Noah Berry

    Paralegal

In other news

Branding on trend: Certification of Australian Fashion

10 May 2022Insight

Verification of identity: a refresher

10 May 2022Insight

Categorising land for rating purposes used for both permanent residential and temporary tourist accommodation

4 May 2022Insight

Court of Appeal decision brings welcome relief to local councils

4 May 2022Insight

VIEW ALL NEWS & INSIGHTS

BRISBANE

Level 11, 66 Eagle Street
Brisbane QLD 4000
GPO Box 1855
Brisbane QLD 4001
Tel +61 7 3233 8888
Fax +61 7 3229 9949

 

GET IN TOUCH

    Contact form

    We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

    Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

    sydney

    Level 32, MLC Centre
    19 Martin Place
    Sydney NSW 2000
    GPO Box 462
    Sydney NSW 2001

    Tel +61 2 8241 5600
    Fax +61 2 8241 5699

     

    GET IN TOUCH

      Contact form


      We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

      Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

      melbourne

      Level 27, 101 Collins Street
      Melbourne VIC 3000
      GPO Box 2924
      Melbourne VIC 3001

      Tel +61 3 9067 3100
      Fax +61 3 9067 3199

       

      GET IN TOUCH

        Contact form

        We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

        Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

        follow us

        CLIENT LOGIN

        newcastle

        92 Young Street
        Carrington NSW 2294
        PO Box 394
        Newcastle NSW 2300

        Tel +61 2 4914 6900
        Fax +61 2 4914 6999

         

        GET IN TOUCH

          Contact form


          We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

          Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

          canberra

          Level 9, 2 Phillip Law Street
          Canberra ACT 2601

          Tel +61 2 6243 3669
          Fax +61 2 8241 5699

           

          GET IN TOUCH

            Contact form


            We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

            Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

            © 2017 McCullough Robertson. Site map Disclaimer Privacy Policy Statement of Business Ethics Credit Reporting Policy

            X