Skip to content

  • Home
  • COVID-19 Guide
  • Podcast library
  • Client results
  • Expertise
  • News & Insights
  • People
  • Our DNA
  • Inclusion and Diversity
  • Join us
  • Contact Us
Home / NEWS & INSIGHTS / Insight / Employee or Independent Contractor? Consequences for Superannuation
Insight 8 March 2022

Employee or Independent Contractor? Consequences for Superannuation

The High Court has recently addressed the approach for determining whether workers are employees or independent contractors,[1] while remitting an important question of whether the workers fall within the expanded definition of employee under the superannuation regime.

In ZG Operations v Jamsek, the High Court found that two truck drivers, each with a partnership and owning their own truck, were independent contractors of the company, and not employees. 

Expanded definition of employees under super regime

The drivers, Mr Jamsek and Mr Whitby, raised a cross-appeal in which they contended they fell within the expanded definition of employee under the superannuation guarantee regime.

Section 12(3) of the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (Cth) expands the common law definition of employee for the purposes of administering the regime and states that:

‘if a person works under a contract that is wholly or principally for the labour of the person, the person is an employee of the other party to the contract.’

At first instance, the primary judge rejected the contention that Mr Jamsek and Mr Whitby fell within this expanded definition for two reasons:

  • the relevant contracts were between the company and the partnerships, and not Mr Jamsek and Mr Whitby as individuals; and
  • the contracts were not principally for the labour of the person, but rather were for the provision of substantial equipment as well as labour. 

On appeal, the Federal Court determined that Mr Jamsek and Mr Whitby were employees, and as a result did not need to address whether they fell within this expanded definition.

Before the High Court, Mr Jamsek and Mr Whitby in response to the above reasons submitted that section 12(3) only required a person work ‘under’ a contract, not that the person was themselves a party to the contract.   

They further contended that while one of the purposes of the contract was the provision of equipment, the contract remained one that was principally for the labour of Mr Jamsek and Mr Whitby.

What now for employers?

The High Court indicated these arguments were not insubstantial. The Court declined to deal with this question, however, noting it would be inappropriate to do so where the Commissioner of Taxation was not party to the proceedings. Accordingly, it remitted this question to the Full Court to answer (following joinder of the Commissioner as a party).

While the expanded definition of employee in section 12(3) has always encompassed the possibility that it could apply to independent contractors, the outcome of this decision may provide further insight for employers on this application. This is an important consideration, as workers engaged as contractors that fall within this definition will impact the employer’s liability for superannuation contributions.

For an analysis of the impact of these decisions on employers from an employment perspective, see our Employment Team’s article here.

For more information about the two cases, or for strategic advice about navigating superannuation liability in relation to contractor/employee issues, contact our team here.


[1] Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 1 available here; ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek [2022] HCA 2 available here.

This publication covers legal and technical issues in a general way. It is not designed to express opinions on specific cases. It is intended for information purposes only and should not be regarded as legal advice. Further advice should be obtained before taking action on any issue dealt with in this publication.

About the authors

  • David Hughes

    Partner
  • Anushka De Alwis

    Senior Associate
  • Lauren Trickey

    Lawyer

In other news

Branding on trend: Certification of Australian Fashion

10 May 2022Insight

Verification of identity: a refresher

10 May 2022Insight

Categorising land for rating purposes used for both permanent residential and temporary tourist accommodation

4 May 2022Insight

Court of Appeal decision brings welcome relief to local councils

4 May 2022Insight

VIEW ALL NEWS & INSIGHTS

BRISBANE

Level 11, 66 Eagle Street
Brisbane QLD 4000
GPO Box 1855
Brisbane QLD 4001
Tel +61 7 3233 8888
Fax +61 7 3229 9949

 

GET IN TOUCH

    Contact form

    We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

    Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

    sydney

    Level 32, MLC Centre
    19 Martin Place
    Sydney NSW 2000
    GPO Box 462
    Sydney NSW 2001

    Tel +61 2 8241 5600
    Fax +61 2 8241 5699

     

    GET IN TOUCH

      Contact form


      We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

      Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

      melbourne

      Level 27, 101 Collins Street
      Melbourne VIC 3000
      GPO Box 2924
      Melbourne VIC 3001

      Tel +61 3 9067 3100
      Fax +61 3 9067 3199

       

      GET IN TOUCH

        Contact form

        We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

        Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

        follow us

        CLIENT LOGIN

        newcastle

        92 Young Street
        Carrington NSW 2294
        PO Box 394
        Newcastle NSW 2300

        Tel +61 2 4914 6900
        Fax +61 2 4914 6999

         

        GET IN TOUCH

          Contact form


          We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

          Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

          canberra

          Level 9, 2 Phillip Law Street
          Canberra ACT 2601

          Tel +61 2 6243 3669
          Fax +61 2 8241 5699

           

          GET IN TOUCH

            Contact form


            We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

            Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

            © 2017 McCullough Robertson. Site map Disclaimer Privacy Policy Statement of Business Ethics Credit Reporting Policy

            X