Skip to content

  • Home
  • COVID-19 Guide
  • Podcast library
  • Client results
  • Expertise
  • News & Insights
  • People
  • Our DNA
  • Inclusion and Diversity
  • Join us
  • Contact Us
Home / NEWS & INSIGHTS / Insight / Customary turnover and notice of termination
Insight 1 May 2018

Customary turnover and notice of termination

WHO SHOULD READ THIS
  • Employers operating in service industries (such as cleaning and security) who engage workers upon securing service contracts.
THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW
  • Notice of termination of employment needs to be communicated in clear and unambiguous terms.
  • An employee’s employment agreement should reflect the fact that their employment is dependant upon the continuance of a service contract of their employer.
WHAT YOU NEED TO DO
  • When terminating an employee’s employment always make it clear that their employment is being terminated and clearly state a date at which their employment will end.
  • To fall within the exception not to pay redundancy pay, a court will need to be satisfied that the turn-over of employees is a common, long continued practice.

The Federal Court (FC) has found that an employer, who incorrectly relied upon the redundancy pay exception for ordinary and customary turnover of labour, was liable to pay its employees redundancy entitlements after the exception was found not to apply.

Background

Berkley Challenge Pty Limited (Berkley), a member of the Spotless Group, provided security, cleaning and related services to shopping centres. In late 2014 it lost a tender to supply these services to a shopping centre on the Sunshine Coast.

As a result of the loss of the tender, Berkley’s employees who carried out the security, cleaning and related services at the shopping centre on the Sunshine Coast were notified that Berkley had lost the contract to provide these services (Notice).

Ultimately, the roles of Berkley’s employees were redundant. However, Berkley did not pay the employees redundancy pay because it claimed this situation was covered by an exception set out in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act).

United Voice (union) claimed that the Notice was not a valid termination of the affected employee’s employment and that the affected employees were entitled to redundancy pay.

Notice of termination

Berkley contended that the Notice was a valid notice of termination of employment in accordance with the Act. It argued that when deciding whether the Notice was valid the FC should consider the context in which the Notice was given to the employees (i.e. the loss of contract with the shopping centre).

The FC rejected Berkley’s argument, holding that the termination provisions of the Act require an employer to provide employees with notice that is ‘unambiguously clear’ that their employment ‘is to be terminated with effect from a certain date in the future’.

Judge Reeves found the Notice fell short of this obligation as it did not clearly notify the employees that their employment was terminating and failed to say at what date their employment would end.

Redundancy pay

Section 119(1)(a) of the Act allows an employer not to pay redundancy pay where the termination of the employee’s employment is ‘due to the ordinary and customary turnover of labour’.

Berkley argued that the loss and gain of client contracts (similar to that of the shopping centre at the Sunshine Coast) was a normal feature of its business and therefore fell within the exception under section 119(1)(a). Judge Reeves clarified that the exception to the payment of redundancy pay only applies to an employer, whose labour turnover is both common, usual and a matter of long-continued practice.

Upon examining the evidence the FC found that Berkley had provided services to the shopping centre for 21 years prior to losing the tender in 2014. Further, the employees’ employment agreements did not contain a clause that their employment was dependant on the continuance of the contract between Berkley and the shopping centre. The FC ultimately held that the exception did not apply because the redundancies related to the loss of a contract which was uncommon and extraordinary and not a matter of long continued practice.

Berkley was found to have contravened the Act and ordered to pay compensation in relation to the failure to provide notice and the failure to pay redundancy pay.

This publication covers legal and technical issues in a general way. It is not designed to express opinions on specific cases. It is intended for information purposes only and should not be regarded as legal advice. Further advice should be obtained before taking action on any issue dealt with in this publication.

About the authors

  • Tim Longwill

    Partner

In other news

Branding on trend: Certification of Australian Fashion

10 May 2022Insight

Verification of identity: a refresher

10 May 2022Insight

Categorising land for rating purposes used for both permanent residential and temporary tourist accommodation

4 May 2022Insight

Court of Appeal decision brings welcome relief to local councils

4 May 2022Insight

VIEW ALL NEWS & INSIGHTS

BRISBANE

Level 11, 66 Eagle Street
Brisbane QLD 4000
GPO Box 1855
Brisbane QLD 4001
Tel +61 7 3233 8888
Fax +61 7 3229 9949

 

GET IN TOUCH

    Contact form

    We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

    Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

    sydney

    Level 32, MLC Centre
    19 Martin Place
    Sydney NSW 2000
    GPO Box 462
    Sydney NSW 2001

    Tel +61 2 8241 5600
    Fax +61 2 8241 5699

     

    GET IN TOUCH

      Contact form


      We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

      Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

      melbourne

      Level 27, 101 Collins Street
      Melbourne VIC 3000
      GPO Box 2924
      Melbourne VIC 3001

      Tel +61 3 9067 3100
      Fax +61 3 9067 3199

       

      GET IN TOUCH

        Contact form

        We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

        Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

        follow us

        CLIENT LOGIN

        newcastle

        92 Young Street
        Carrington NSW 2294
        PO Box 394
        Newcastle NSW 2300

        Tel +61 2 4914 6900
        Fax +61 2 4914 6999

         

        GET IN TOUCH

          Contact form


          We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

          Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

          canberra

          Level 9, 2 Phillip Law Street
          Canberra ACT 2601

          Tel +61 2 6243 3669
          Fax +61 2 8241 5699

           

          GET IN TOUCH

            Contact form


            We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

            Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

            © 2017 McCullough Robertson. Site map Disclaimer Privacy Policy Statement of Business Ethics Credit Reporting Policy

            X