Skip to content

  • Home
  • COVID-19 Guide
  • Podcast library
  • Client results
  • Expertise
  • News & Insights
  • People
  • Our DNA
  • Inclusion and Diversity
  • Join us
  • Contact Us
Home / NEWS & INSIGHTS / Blog / The Handshake / Pikachu-se your fights carefully against copyright infringers
The Handshake 1 March 2018

Pikachu-se your fights carefully against copyright infringers

In mid 2016, the Pokémon Go augmented reality game was the talk of the town with children to adults roaming the streets, phone in hand, trying to “catch’em all”. Pikachu, a central character in the series, is recognisable by most. One would assume that copying the famous Pikachu image would be fraught with danger. Right?

In a recent case, The Pokémon Company International, Inc. (TPCI) commenced Federal Court proceedings against Redbubble Ltd (Redbubble) claiming copyright infringement of TPCI’s Pikachu image (among others). While the court found in favour of TPCI, TPCI was awarded 70% of its legal costs and nominal damages of only AU$1.

So why the low damages claim?

Background

Redbubble is an internet marketplace for ‘print on demand’ personalised products. The website allows independent artists to upload their art works to an online shop, where consumers select and purchase works to print on t-shirts, phone cases or similar products. In return, the artist receives payment for the purchase of their work.

Redbubble as host of the website recognised the risk of artists uploading infringing works for sale. Redbubble sought to mitigate this risk through their user terms and conditions which provided users could not upload copyright infringing materials.

Redbubble implemented other policies and procedures such as a publicly available IP policy, a content team which monitored the site, and a process whereby intellectual property owners could notify Redbubble of infringing works and ask for them to be removed. Redbubble could also block users from using certain keywords and trade marks. Redbubble also did not manufacture, warehouse, dispatch, receive or distribute any physical products ordered through the site; third party fulfillers would manufacture the products (fulfillers were selected by Redbubble software based on a purchaser’s email address).

TPCI’s claims

Certain images uploaded by artists to Redbubble’s website were similar to the Pokémon character Pikachu and also contained the Pokémon’s name.

TPCI successfully claimed that Redbubble had:

  • engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct by representing that TPCI was permitted to sell Pokémon merchandise (by Redbubble’s sponsored links on Google and its website), and
  • infringed TPCI’s copyright in images of the Pikachu Pokémon character by:
    • making the infringing works available online or electronically transmitting the infringing works
    • offering the infringing works for sale, and
    • authorising a reproduction of an infringing work.
The Decision

TPCI sought approximately $44,000 in damages. However, only nominal damages of $1 were awarded to TPCI because the court found that:

  • TPCI would not have been entitled to a royalty in respect of many (if not all) of the infringing products sold
  • most of the sales were not the kind of items available for sale and commercialisation within ‘the Pokémon universe’, and
  • many of the items involved a ‘mash up’ of images (such as an image of Pickachu with Homer Simpson).

In these circumstances, the court determined that TPCI could not show it suffered loss or damage, and just because the items were sold, did not mean TPCI or its licensees would have sold them.
TPCI also claimed discretionary damages for breach of copyright (often awarded if the infringer’s conduct is ‘flagrant’). However, the court found that Redbubble had implemented processes to prevent and mitigate breaches which were ‘reasonable and defensible’. Flagrancy was not established merely because copyright was infringed.

Lessons

Redbubble’s awareness of the risks associated with their business, their approach to mitigate the risks they had identified, and the many reasonable steps they took when notified of the infringement ultimately led to the low damages claim in this instance.

Businesses, particularly those hosting websites where the risk of intellectual property infringement is high, should take all reasonable steps to manage and mitigate risk through good terms and conditions and policies regarding IP infringement. Complaints from intellectual property owners should also be taken seriously and actioned swiftly.

Copyright owners should be careful to identify the damages they have suffered, or may suffer from a particular copyright infringement. This will inform a cost-risk analysis for infringement claims. In respect of copyright infringers, unfortunately you can’t “catch ’em all”.

This publication covers legal and technical issues in a general way. It is not designed to express opinions on specific cases. It is intended for information purposes only and should not be regarded as legal advice. Further advice should be obtained before taking action on any issue dealt with in this publication.

About the authors

  • Belinda Breakspear

    Partner
  • Caroline Law-Walsh

    Special Counsel

In other news

New domain name Licensing Rules to come into effect in Australia from 12 April 2021

5 March 2021Insight

Tax administration lessons learnt from COVID-19 (and promptly forgotten)

24 February 2021Insight

Queensland’s new project trust regime to commence on 1 March 2021

15 February 2021BIF Act Amendment Series, Insight

McCullough Robertson strengthens its National Construction and Infrastructure team with key Partner hire in Brisbane

27 January 2021News

VIEW ALL NEWS & INSIGHTS

BRISBANE

Level 11, 66 Eagle Street
Brisbane QLD 4000
GPO Box 1855
Brisbane QLD 4001
Tel +61 7 3233 8888
Fax +61 7 3229 9949

 

GET IN TOUCH

    Contact form

    We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

    sydney

    Level 32, MLC Centre
    19 Martin Place
    Sydney NSW 2000
    GPO Box 462
    Sydney NSW 2001

    Tel +61 2 8241 5600
    Fax +61 2 8241 5699

     

    GET IN TOUCH

      Contact form


      We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

      melbourne

      Level 27, 101 Collins Street
      Melbourne VIC 3000
      GPO Box 2924
      Melbourne VIC 3001

      Tel +61 3 9067 3100
      Fax +61 3 9067 3199

       

      GET IN TOUCH

        Contact form

        We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

        follow us

        CLIENT LOGIN

        newcastle

        Level 2, 16 Telford Street
        Newcastle NSW 2300
        PO Box 394
        Newcastle NSW 2300

        Tel +61 2 4914 6900
        Fax +61 2 4914 6999

         

        GET IN TOUCH

          Contact form


          We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

          canberra

          Level 9, 2 Phillip Law Street
          Canberra ACT 2601

          Tel +61 2 6243 3699
          Fax +61 2 8241 5699

           

          GET IN TOUCH

            Contact form


            We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

            © 2017 McCullough Robertson. Site map Disclaimer Privacy Policy Statement of Business Ethics Credit Reporting Policy

            X