Skip to content

  • Home
  • COVID-19 Guide
  • Podcast library
  • Client results
  • Expertise
  • News & Insights
  • People
  • Our DNA
  • Inclusion and Diversity
  • Join us
  • Contact Us
Home / NEWS & INSIGHTS / Insight / PPSA update: appeal dismissed in Forge Group case – lessors (and buyers) beware
Insight 10 February 2017

PPSA update: appeal dismissed in Forge Group case – lessors (and buyers) beware

WHO SHOULD READ THIS
  • Owners of property who are leasing or hiring out their property to third parties.
THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW
  • The Forge decision confirms that the PPSA applies to the lease of equipment and demonstrates the critical need for lessors of equipment to consider PPSA issues (including legal issues around whether something is a fixture) and to undertake the necessary registrations or risk losing the equipment.
WHAT YOU NEED TO DO
  • Ensure your property is adequately and appropriately protected, including by way of registration of security interests on the PPSR.

The New South Wales Court of Appeal (Court of Appeal) has dismissed an appeal by PowerRental Op Co Australia LLC (OpCo) and Power Rental Asset Co Two LLC (AssetCo) (Appellants) against the decision of the New South Wales Supreme Court in Forge Group Power Pty Limited (in liquidation (receivers and managers appointed) v General Electric International Inc & Ors (2016) 305 FLR 101 by confirming the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth) (PPSA) applied to the lease of equipment in question.

This confirms the critical need for lessors of equipment to consider PPSA issues (including legal issues around whether something is a fixture) and undertake the necessary registrations or risk losing their equipment.

Background

As we reported in our article of 20 October 2016, in March 2013 Forge Group Power Pty Ltd (Forge) entered into a lease with General Electric International Inc (GE) under which Forge agreed to lease four mobile gas turbine generator sets (Turbines) from GE for a fixed term.

In October 2013, the relevant part of GE’s rental business was sold to APR Energy PLC (APR). GE assigned the benefit of its lease to OpCo and assigned title in the Turbines to AssetCo, both American corporations. OpCo and AssetCo were formerly subsidiaries of GE and became subsidiaries of APR.

The question for the primary judge in the Supreme Court of New South Wales’ decision was whether the PPSA applied to the lease of the Turbines.

In that decision, the Court held that:

  • the lease was for longer than 12 months and GE was regularly engaged in the business of leasing goods, and was therefore a ‘PPS Lease’ within the definition of section 13 of the PPSA, and
  • the Turbines had not become fixtures to the land.

As such, the Court found that the PPSA applied to the lease and that AssetCo and OpCo’s interests in the Turbines vested in Forge and became Forge’s property immediately before Forge entered into administration in accordance with section 267 of the PPSA because they had failed to register their interests under the PPS Lease on the Personal Property Securities Register (PPSR).

Power Rental Op Co Australia, LLC v Forge Group Power Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (receivers and managers appointed) [2017] NSWCA 8

AssetCo and OpCo appealed the decision in the New South Wales Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal’s decision was handed down on 6 February 2017.

The Appellants advanced two lines of argument (either of which would have meant the Turbines did not become Forge’s property immediately before it entered administration):

  • first, that the definition of ‘fixtures’ in the PPSA did not import well-known common law concepts but instead adopted a bespoke definition in which affixation was the only relevant definition. Correct application of that test, it was argued, should have resulted in a finding that the Turbines had become fixtures, and
  • secondly, and alternatively, if the definition of ‘fixtures’ did involve common law concepts, the primary judge failed (or failed sufficiently) to take into account the purpose of affixation, the temporary nature of the affixation and the physical characteristics of the Turbines.

The Court of Appeal dismissed both lines of argument confirming the primary judge’s findings that the lease in question was a PPS Lease and confirming that the failure of the lessor to register its security interest in the Turbines on the PPSR had the consequence that Forge had better title to the Turbines than the owner or lessor of the Turbines.

In dismissing the appeal, the Court of Appeal held that:

  • the definition of ‘fixtures’ in the PPSA was intended to import the common law notions of affixation that ‘a fixture is an item of tangible personal property that is annexed to real property in such as way as to become a part of the real property and that whether an item is a fixture “depends on the degree and purpose of annexation of the item as well as the rebuttable presumption that what is fixed to land is a fixture and that which is not remains a chattel”’ is the relevant test (not a bespoke test such as a fixture is a ‘non-trivial attachment’), and
  • that the Turbines had not become fixtures for the purposes of the PPSA.
What does this decision mean?

The decision is an instructive and timely reminder of the vulnerability of owners of property when leasing or hiring out their property to third parties.

The decision also highlights the importance of thorough due diligence for any business acquisition. Due diligence which identifies a failure to register such as this could then either be dealt with by seeking registration in certain circumstances or obtaining appropriate indemnities or security from the seller.

Owners need to ensure their property is adequately and appropriately protected, including by way of registration of security interests on the PPSR.

We can assist you or your business with identifying how best to protect your interests under the PPSA.

If you have any questions about this case or would like any advice on PPSA issues, please contact us.

This publication covers legal and technical issues in a general way. It is not designed to express opinions on specific cases. It is intended for information purposes only and should not be regarded as legal advice. Further advice should be obtained before taking action on any issue dealt with in this publication.

About the authors

  • Kristen Podagiel

    Managing Partner
  • David Gilham

    Partner
  • Peter Kennedy

    Special Counsel
  • Emma Murray

    Special Counsel

In other news

Branding on trend: Certification of Australian Fashion

10 May 2022Insight

Verification of identity: a refresher

10 May 2022Insight

Categorising land for rating purposes used for both permanent residential and temporary tourist accommodation

4 May 2022Insight

Court of Appeal decision brings welcome relief to local councils

4 May 2022Insight

VIEW ALL NEWS & INSIGHTS

BRISBANE

Level 11, 66 Eagle Street
Brisbane QLD 4000
GPO Box 1855
Brisbane QLD 4001
Tel +61 7 3233 8888
Fax +61 7 3229 9949

 

GET IN TOUCH

    Contact form

    We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

    Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

    sydney

    Level 32, MLC Centre
    19 Martin Place
    Sydney NSW 2000
    GPO Box 462
    Sydney NSW 2001

    Tel +61 2 8241 5600
    Fax +61 2 8241 5699

     

    GET IN TOUCH

      Contact form


      We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

      Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

      melbourne

      Level 27, 101 Collins Street
      Melbourne VIC 3000
      GPO Box 2924
      Melbourne VIC 3001

      Tel +61 3 9067 3100
      Fax +61 3 9067 3199

       

      GET IN TOUCH

        Contact form

        We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

        Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

        follow us

        CLIENT LOGIN

        newcastle

        92 Young Street
        Carrington NSW 2294
        PO Box 394
        Newcastle NSW 2300

        Tel +61 2 4914 6900
        Fax +61 2 4914 6999

         

        GET IN TOUCH

          Contact form


          We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

          Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

          canberra

          Level 9, 2 Phillip Law Street
          Canberra ACT 2601

          Tel +61 2 6243 3669
          Fax +61 2 8241 5699

           

          GET IN TOUCH

            Contact form


            We handle your personal information in accordance with our privacy policy.

            Please do not send us any confidential information. By submitting this form, you agree that our review of the information you submit will not create a lawyer-client relationship between you and our firm (or any lawyer in our firm) and it will not prevent us from representing a party in any matter where the information you submit is relevant, even if that information could be used against you.

            © 2017 McCullough Robertson. Site map Disclaimer Privacy Policy Statement of Business Ethics Credit Reporting Policy

            X