View a publication
|
|||
Food and Agribusiness01 June 2010 |
|||
Great Barrier Reef wetland protectionNew planning provisions have been introduced that are likely to have a significant impact on rural activities occurring from the Daintree catchment in Far North Queensland, to the Baffle Creek catchment just above Bundaberg. These new provisions are likely to require approval for rural activities such as the construction of dams, and other earthworks that are categorised as being high impact earthworks such as diversion banks or roadworks, that previously did not require any approval. Great, a barrier, or a benefit to the reef?On 30 April 2010, the Department of Environment and Resource Management (DERM) introduced some regulatory amendments providing greater protection of wetlands of high ecological significance in Great Barrier Reef catchments. The new wetlands regulatory regime consists of:
Will your development be affected by the new regime?Landholders, urban developers or primary producers who want to carry out high impact earthworks that are located in a referable wetland area will have to submit an application through the Integrated Development Assessment System (IDAS) of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (Qld) (SPA). SubmissionsDespite the regime already being in force, submissions about the regulatory impact statement, SPP for GBR Wetlands and amended regulations are open until 30 June 2010. The outcome of the submission process may impact whether the temporary SPP for GBR Wetlands (which is in force for 12 months) becomes permanent and operational for 10 years. Is my property within a Great Barrier Reef wetland protection area?The 35 Great Barrier Reef catchments range from the Daintree River catchment to the Baffle Creek catchment. By entering your lot and plan number in the online form at www.derm.qld.gov.au/wildlife-ecosystems/ecosystems/referable-wetlands-form.php you can find out if your property contains a referable wetland. What type of development triggers assessment under the new regime?Schedule 3, part 1, table 4 SP Regulation establishes the development assessment triggers for a Great Barrier Reef wetland protection area. They include:
‘Domestic housing activity’ is defined as a single residence on a lot and any associated building or structure (such as a granny flat or home business). Does my development involve high impact earthworks?‘High impact earthworks’ means operational work that involves changing the form of land, or placing a structure on land, in a way that diverts water to or from a wetland. Examples include:
High impact earthworks are not works undertaken for a domestic housing activity, to maintain infrastructure or for routine farm management activities, such as preparing existing cropped areas for cultivation. What will it cost me?The new wetland regulatory regime is likely to impose appreciable costs on industry and rural landholders in the form of application fees and assessment studies and on state and local governments in the form of administration and assessment costs. Development for urban purposes (such as industrial, sporting, recreation and commercial purposes) attracts an application fee of up to $5,000. Development not for urban purposes (such as environmental, conservational, rural and natural purposes) attracts an application fee of up to $2,000. Assessment reports relating to site design and layout, hydrology and ecology may also be required which could cost in excess of $40,000. How will my application be assessed?The SPP for GBR Wetlands came into being with the overarching outcome to ensure development in, or adjacent to, wetlands of high ecological significance in Great Barrier Reef catchments is planned, designed, constructed and operated to minimise or prevent the loss or degradation of the wetlands and their values, or enhances these values. An assessment manager must have regard to the SPP for GBR Wetlands if the development is considered assessable and where a planning scheme does not appropriately reflect the SPP. Where these circumstances apply, applications are to be assessed against the development outcomes and the development assessment code of the SPP. Development that does not fully achieve the policy outcome of the SPP for GBR Wetlands is acceptable if the development either provides for an overriding need in the public interest, or achieves the development outcomes under the SPP to the maximum extent practicable having regard to the intrinsic characteristics of the development. Further informationFor any specific questions or if you would like assistance in making a submission feel free to contact us and we can assist you further: Food and Agribusiness Group contact Diana Lohrisch on 07 3233 8845 Planning and Environment Group contacts Stuart Macnaughton on 07 3233 8869 |
Home | Privacy | Disclaimer | Contact us
© McCullough Robertson 2010

