Publications / Finance

31 May 17
Defective PPS registration against an ABN instead of an ACN strikes again


  • Any party with a security interest registrable or registered on the PPSR including financiers, other lenders, and lessors in the business of leasing goods.


  • A simple error in a PPSR registration may render a registration defective if not registered against the correct grantor identifier.


  • Review your current registrations and ensure your future registrations comply with registration requirements. 

The case of Production Printing (Aust) Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2017] NSWSC 505 provides a costly reminder of the point made earlier this year in Re Onesteel Manufacturing Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) that a security interest registered on the Personal Property Securities Register (PPSR) must be registered against the correct grantor details, and a failure to do so may mean the security interest will be defective and the asset lost.

On 4 December 2014, HP Financial Services (Australia) Pty Ltd (HP) entered into a master equipment finance agreement with Production Printing (Aust) Pty Ltd (Production Printing).  On the same day, HP registered a security interest in respect of printing equipment to be leased under the equipment finance agreement.  HP registered their security interest against Production Printing’s Australian business number (ABN) rather than its Australian company number (ACN).  

Between 5 December 2014 and 19 October 2015, HP entered into four leases with Production Printing pursuant to the master equipment financing agreement in respect of printing equipment purchased for over $4 million.  On 22 July 2016, Production Printing was placed into voluntary administration, and HP was notified that the administrators considered the registration was defective.

In our earlier alert dated 21 February 2017 on the Re Onesteel Manufacturing Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) case, we noted that section 153 of the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth) (PPSA) and Schedule 1 of the Personal Property Securities Regulations 2010 (Cth) set out specific requirements for registration, including that where the grantor is a body corporate, the security interest must be registered against the company’s ACN (unless it is a responsible entity of a registered scheme and has an Australian Registered Scheme Number).

In Re Onesteel, it was held that registering against a company’s ABN as opposed to the ACN made the registration defective.  In this case, HP made an argument not run in Re Onesteel, arguing that section 166 of the PPSA temporarily preserved their security interest. 

However, the Court rejected that argument and held that the exception under section 166 of the PPSA in relation to defective registrations only apply to allow a secured party to correct registrations where events beyond their control have led to a registration becoming defective (for example, when there is a change in the serial number under which collateral is required to be described in the register).   

The Court accordingly affirmed the Re Onesteel decision and has firmly shut the door on the ability of secured parties to attempt to recover their security interest once the grantor suffers an insolvency event if the registration is defective.  It is a costly reminder to register, register within time, and register correctly. 


Focus covers legal and technical issues in a general way.  It is not designed to express opinions on specific cases.  Focus is intended for information purposes only and should not be regarded as legal advice.  Further advice should be obtained before taking action on any issue dealt with in this publication.

In this section


For enquiries please contact: